![[DIGITALE BIBLIOTHEK DER FES]](/images/digbib/d_digbib.gif)
SECTION of DOCUMENT:
[page-number of print-ed.: 75]
APPENDIX III: DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEES QUESTIONNAIRE
DATE |
……………………………………………….. |
|
PROVINCE |
……………………………………………….. |
|
DISTRICT |
……………………………………………….. |
|
DISTRIBUTION POINT |
……………………………………………….. |
|
WARDS |
……………………………………………….. |
|
COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE …………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………… | |
|
1. |
What are the functions of the committee? ………………………………………………………………… |
|
2. |
Number of households falling under distribution point. ………………………………………………………………… |
Season |
Month received |
No. of recipients |
Quantity of inputs distributed |
||||||||
maize (kg) |
Sorghum (kg) |
millet (kg) |
Sunflower (kg) |
Compound D (kg) |
AN (kg) |
Gypsum |
SSP |
Gnuts |
|||
1996/97 | |||||||||||
1995/96 | |||||||||||
1994/95 | |||||||||||
1993/94 | |||||||||||
1992/93 | |||||||||||
|
3. |
How do you determine the recipients? …………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………….. |
[page-number of print-ed.: 76]
|
4. |
a) |
Did you have a say in the choice of inputs that you received? | |
|
1. |
Yes |
||
|
2. |
No |
||
|
b) |
If yes, did you get the expected inputs? | ||
|
1. |
Yes |
||
|
2. |
No |
||
|
5. |
a) |
Were the inputs appropriate | |
|
1. |
Yes |
||
|
2. |
No |
||
|
b) |
If no, which inputs were inappropriate? …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… | ||
|
| |||
|
6. |
a) |
Were you involved in determining the amounts of inputs that you received? | |
|
1. |
Yes |
||
|
2. |
No |
||
|
b) |
Comment if yes or no …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… | ||
|
| |||
|
7. |
Were farmers paying for casual labour for | ||
|
a) |
off loading the inputs | ||
|
1. |
Yes |
||
|
2. |
No |
||
|
b) |
Guarding/ security of the inputs | ||
|
1. |
Yes |
||
|
2. |
No |
||
|
| |||
|
8. |
How much were they paying? …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… | ||
[page-number of print-ed.: 77]
|
9. |
Were there any incidences where | |
|
a) |
farmers sold the inputs that they received under the programme |
|
|
b) |
consumed seed received under programme |
|
|
c) |
refused to collect the inputs |
|
|
d) |
Explain reasons from previous question …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… |
|
|
10. |
List problems encountered during the whole exercise …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… | |
|
11. |
How did you solve the problem? …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… | |
|
12. |
How do you think the programme can be improved? …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… | |
[page-number of print-ed.: 78]
|
b.2) |
If yes, explain …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… |
|
c.1) |
refused to collect the inputs …………………………………………………… |
|
c.2) |
If yes, explain …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… |
|
12. |
List problems encountered during the whole exercise …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… |
|
13. |
How did you solve the problems? …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… |
|
14. |
How do you think the programme can be improved? …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… |
© Friedrich Ebert Stiftung | technical support | net edition fes-library | Januar 2002
