1. our historical values, our principles and our goals are still
our compass
We often say, and really mean, that PASOK has come from way back
and will go even further. Our course may well adapt to changing
circumstances which may require twists and turns in our course. But
this is precisely why we are, and will remain the popular majority
movement which has governed this country for many years. Moreover,
along our historic path we maintain remarkable consistency.
Irrespective of failures, mistakes, inconsistencies, problems,
intrinsic or underlying weaknesses, for us the best general interest
of the Hellenic people is always the ultimate measure of our
actions.
In the face of the difficulties we are enduring today which we
would like to overcome, by using this Convention as a catalyst, many
ask if we have changed our goals and direction, if we still maintain
our historical values, principles and initial targets. This time our
answer will not take the form of a new ideological declaration. It
will be a collation of some phrases encapsulating our ideological
background.
PASOK is an open socialist, patriotic and democratic movement
battling for the universal values of freedom, democracy, peace,
solidarity amongst all people, spiritual and material progress,
social justice and the prosperity of the citizenry.
It has faith in the historical and humanistic values of
democratic socialism and, with by all lawful means, protects the
life of the individual, the free development of their personality
and their dignity.
With our ideology based on the declaration founding PASOK on
"September 3rd" 1974 we seek to strengthen and fight for national
independence, popular domination, social emancipation and democratic
procedures. It is firmly orientated towards achieving national
unity, defence of our country's territorial integrity and serving
the best interests of Hellenism everywhere. It also battles for and
advances the social interests of the powers of progress and
creativity, the weaker classes and echelons of the population and
steadies itself on the massive social majority of the forces of
labor, production, culture, science, ecology and social
solidarity.
It contributes to strengthening contemporary multi-party
parliamentary democracy with all its power. It defends the
fundamental rights of all citizens. It preaches for a free,
pluralistic and just society, which will be cohesive, it will
provide equal opportunities to all and it will believe in
meritocracy. To this end, it spurns oppression, exploitation and
alienation of any individual. It fights for a fair distribution of
wealth. It believes that any person on the face of the earth has a
right to life, a dignified way of life, education, free time, to
express his opinion without fear, and to be his own master.
Finally, PASOK reinforces citizens' initiatives to protect the
environment, raise the standard of living and pursue the right to
work. It encourages every attempt to preserve and project our
cultural heritage. Furthermore, it is in favor of free individual or
collective artistic pursuits (and, in turn, criticism). It aspires
not only to make education available to all sections of society, but
also for the individual to be spiritually accomplished, that is,
through his culture.
Further, it believes that all the residents of our country,
including migrants to whom we have extended hospitality to live and
work in Greece, have these rights irrespective of their national,
religious, cultural and social differences.
Using these ideological axes as guides, we are following
development of the global community, in the global era and are
participating on an equal footing in the processes of the European
Left and European socialist movements, in the processes of the
progressive global socialist movement, and the Socialist
International.
2. We turn yet another page
In a world subject to lightning changes, we continue to use
"Greece comes first" as our policy banner.
We are fighting for a powerful democratic, modern Greece,
developed and just, in a Europe united and in progressive in global
competition.
We are fighting for a Greece which is a significant regional
European power, a force for peace, stability and cooperation in the
wider area.
We are fighting for a Greece which today - especially today - can
actively contribute to the progress of humanity in a world without
borders.
For us, there is no contradiction in defending a homeland, which
by its nature, history and course is universal, and in defending the
goal of European and global cooperation for a just, safer and
prosperous world. We are sure that in a world without borders, in a
united progressive Europe, we have a more powerful position and more
important role.
With our country's entry into the Economic and Monetary Union,
which essentially and officially validates our presence in the
forefront of European developments, we have definitely risen to the
challenge that has accompanied our Movement throughout its historic
course for many decades: To cease being a nation panting
breathlessly as it attempts to keep up with developments.
Today we are well aware that not only can we keep up with
developments, but feel more secure with greater ability and more
opportunities to play our contemporary role.
This historic leap forward was won with a hard struggle. It was
not granted us by anybody. We realized it by our own persistence and
power of will, with the consent and the sacrifices of our people,
especially the weaker social classes and groups.
Today, while we turn yet another page as a country and as a
society, we must inevitably turn a page as the party which brought
things to where they are. The party which, henceforth, aspires to
set the standards and to play a leading role in the chapter which
opens a truly new era; the turn of the page.
3. We need a new social contract now
In order to achieve these goals for our country, we had to make
two successive social contracts with the people.
The first, focused on Change during the 1980s, essentially
salvaged Greece from underdevelopment, dependence and
marginalization bringing her into the modern world, placing a
re-united hellenism in a dignified position.
The second, focusing on Modernization during the 1990s, brought
Greece into the nucleus of the European entity.
Today we need a new social contract focussed on Prosperity, which
will secure not only the definitive position of our country in the
course of the developed countries of the planet, in the decade we
live, but a life worth living for all our citizens, with justice,
security and solidarity.
Thus, "the citizen first" policy complements the banner of our
options and becomes the starting point for our modern new
progressive proposal.
The citizen coping in a democracy. The worker coping with his
work, the contemporary social state, the fairer and more
proportional distribution of wealth. The resident of the city and
the resident of the countryside coping with the environment and
their living conditions. The consumer facing contemporary
civilization and the quality and utility of goods offered to them by
modern production. The migrant in the face of his need for social
acceptance. A young person coping in a society and country to secure
the prerequisites for making their own way and forming their own
perspective
Everyone of us individually must feel his obligation of social
reciprocity sense and face up to an effort, the fruits of which
yield an ever-increasing positive developmental and social balance.
Always in Greece as she constantly strengthens her voice and
position in the world wide and European setting.
Prosperity has three foundations which reflect on the central
issues of our times. Development, the contemporary state and
democracy are all at the epicenter of evolutionary development, here
and everywhere
The new social contract must clearly aim at ensuring development
with justice and security, in order to provide new inspiration for
reforms in a modern state, and consolidate a contemporary model of
democratic government. Upon these three foundations through our
Convention, we will form a progressive contemporary radical
framework of policies and goals.
We already have a binding agreement. That which was voted for by
the people on that difficult but victorious day in 2000. It is not
merely venerated as a product of constitutional order or of popular
commission. It is a credible, up to date framework, directed towards
the correct target which sets out significant and timely
priorities
We are not dogmatic. In the 18 months which have passed since
then, new data which we must incorporate into our political thought
and practice have been established. Data which relate to the manner
in which we will implement our agreement, the procedures which shape
our political policy in practice, our attitudes and exercise of
power, the completion of our decision making, the specialization ,
re-examination up dating and/or correction of our priorities
The resolutions of our Convention must set the boundaries of this
contemporary radical and progressive framework of policies and
goals, in such a way as to strengthen our governing policy and make
our party again capable of taking the initiative in political and
social evolution.
The new progressive social and political majority, which will
implement the social contract for Prosperity is our target, and
prerequisite for the Movement to revert to a victorious strategy.
Our first major stride will be for Greece in the year 2004, on the
horizon for our first review. The results and the social returns
should be evident and measurable by then.
4. United front against present and the future needs.
In relation to the periods of time we move ahead confirming that
it (the front)resists the passing of time giving us strength and
prospects, changing that which has passed by and tending to brake
the course of our struggle
Thus, as in the 1980s and 1990s, from Change to Modernization, we
have retained the goals and policies which gave meaning and
substance to our battles, and at the same time have pushed ahead
with renewal of our aspirations and choices. Change, Reform and
Modernization have neither reached nor exhausted their limits. In
the cycle of prosperity, they still constitute our constant,
renewable and principal directions embodied in our intrinsic nature
and strategy.
Upon this dialectic relationship to the new social contract
together with the present progressive proposal, a new unity must be
built up within the ranks of our movement.
The lines dividing the "old" and the "new" P.A.S.O.K. will be
overrun.
Unity will not be impressed on the field of the 1996
confrontations, relationships and the distribution of power which we
have established in every previous period, but according to the
needs with which we are now living and which will come in the
future.
We are not trying in this way to avoid critical appraisal of our
course, nor to confront obstacles we ourselves are responsible for
placing in its path. We simply want to place criticism in the
context and dimensions of a totally justified course. And to decide
upon necessary changes, new measures and options in their real
proportions.
Our Movement has the power of self-awareness and the collective
conscience of this evolution. It also has a vigorous internal
strength of renewal, change and adaptation.
It must now prove in practice that it will be directed to the
right objective in today's critical circumstances.
And this is the main requirement of our Convention:
The party's new unity is to be the basis of present and future.
needs
Therefore, the new unity is (to be) built on a basis of the
contemporary modern proposals of the Socialist Left and the powers
of progress.
The new contemporary progressive internationalism in the face of
the consequences of globalization. The proposal of the European Left
for a progressive Europe in the world of competition. Acceptance of
the market and its rules in a regulative context which ensures
balanced growth and social prosperity. The modern role of the state
as a simultaneous vehicle for the State of Law, of the modern Social
State, of the State as a headquarters for development growth and the
State which redistributes income and wealth in a more proportionate
and just fashion, and ensures prosperity and quality of life for its
citizens. It is an ideological and political framework which is
constantly enriched with new ideas which give rise to new needs. It
is the ideological pedestal and emblem of the Left embodying the
unfailing changes brought about in modern times.
5. Confrontation is bipolar. The right wing is our opposition
In facing this proposition, the conservative parties insist on
giving first priority to the achievement of prosperity exclusively
by means of market mechanisms and unlimited competition. They
believe that globalization will inevitably lead to a new more just
order of things. They see the European perspective in the light of
conservative protectionism and re-internationalization and perhaps
the abolishment of intervention policies or their restriction them
to monetary union conditions, disregarding the significance of
economic union.
They equate the social benefits with consumer products and trades
them for profit in the context of the market being accepted as the
exclusive mechanism for economic and social distribution, the
privatization of social services and resources as the natural
consequence and the acceptance of social inequalities.
They are prepared for the effective diminution of European
political institutions and total rejection of their developmental,
distributive and social role to limit them to the areas of the
Market, Currency, Security, External Policy and Defense.
Following a relatively protracted transition period, during which
the dividing lines seemed to be weakened, the policy would be
neutralized, the power of personal images promoted. We are already
entering an era where progressive policies are again being fenced in
by the conservative stance.
The dipole progress - conservatism, contemporary socialism -
neo-liberalism, is a clear hypostasis and determines social and
political developments. In our country, this bipolar confrontation
is developing a more distinctive, deeper dividing line.
The Hellenic Right does not posses the solid European Christian -
democratic tradition and conservative forces. Neither does it
express a contemporary conservative proposal for governing the
country. It has always been a deeply reactionary, anti-institutional
force, identifying itself with the state, dividing citizens into
categories, always linked to the interests of the oligarchy. Even
today, despite attempts to improve its image and prospects, the
appearance of a thoughtless populism and the adoption of every
pretension in the name of "opposition for opposition's sake", as
they visualise a vengeful return to power, not for a moment do they
lose their deeply retrogressive conservative nature
Even in relation to matters of rudimentary social modernization,
their stance serves the most unrestrained reactionary perception. It
is not by mere chance that they presented forceful opposition to all
our reformatory and progressive initiatives, And when they were
called upon to govern in the early 1990s, their policies led the
country into tragic failure and an impasse.
Today, the New Democracy party is dominated by insurmountable
contradictions, all held together by an expectation of obtaining
power as the only adhesive. Nationalistic and obvious neo-liberal
views co-exist, extreme right-wing and royalist junta forces mix
with the neo-conservative. Internal contradictions which preclude
the formulation of even one, at least, credible and coherent
conservative proposal
The prospects of the New Democracy party today, as expressed by
its leadership and the backbone of its members, are worse than they
were during the period 1990 -1993, when they held the country and
society in stagnation.
6. Restructuring a wider progressive domain is basically for us
to undertake
In turning the page, however, the context of bipolar
confrontation cannot remain as it was in respect of the progressive
domain.
The central left-wing in Greece was dominated in the previous
period and is still dominated by standard historical records.
Initially, the political center which, prior to the dictatorship,
was the heart of the democratic front was incorporated into PASOK
during the first period of the change of government with an
overwhelming majority, thus pushing conservation to the right
extreme of the political system. The European central Left never
prospered in Greece for that very reason.
The relationship between PASOK and the traditional Left shifted
amongst "bipartisan domination" and the authority of
"parties-wildcards", and this was a relationship which centered upon
the distribution of power, in the name of uniting the progressive
forces.
Nevertheless, in the mass and social domains, for many years the
line of democratic cooperation which led to positive developments
was consolidated into the need for cohesion which came as a demand
from the very basis of the great democratic front.
The other Left, as it is expressed by its old forms but also from
the processes of the past years, cannot form a third pole. The
unfulfilled aspiration to proven regulator of the developments and a
essential participant in government, to date, limits it to secondary
roles. At the same time, conflicting courses are developing from
within between the two parties of the historic Left, the "renewed"
and the "traditional", with clear and strategically important
divergences.
The new formations which were structured from centrifugal
tendencies of the progressive parties and from their fragmentations,
developed into anything but forcible and dynamic and essentially
remained on the outskirts of the developments.
Today, the global and European developments and the country's
stable orientation are a field of convergence from the progressive
forces. They pave the way to a new era of new relationships and to
the development of new potentialities. PASOK, today, is still a main
vehicle for stability and progress in the political system. However,
that very same political system has problems and inadequacies which
must be managed. So, we have the key responsibility of setting the
bases of its evolutions and at the same time we must redefine the
terms of the new progressive policy and social majority. The
reformation of the greater progressive domain is still an objective
which is indeed more timely than before.
7. the new progressive majority has a clear and decisive social
reference
Beneath the all-powerful edifice of globalization, the rich,
multifaceted and changing reality of the new era can no longer be
confined to traditional patterns of social antithesis alone. The
antitheses which resulted from the initial clash between labour and
capital are being transformed
The intermediate layers did not vanish, and even now exist, and
are playing a more significant role as they consolidate their
position through the acquisition of knowledge. The post-industrial
and technological production model is reversing the balance,
reforming economies and transforming social classes. The "social
center", the receptor of these rapid changes becomes the "apple of
discord" for political parties and surveys of public opinion
response..
Within this fluid and difficult scene, we are nevertheless,
obliged to seek our social references and set the boundaries for the
new progressive coalition of social forces which will constitute the
pedestal of the new progressive majority. In other words, it is
imperative for us to redefine in contemporary terms the social
alliance of the underprivileged and the 'have-nots'.
Firstly, a new progressive social coalition must present a stable
front against the forces of superficial cosmopolitanism, against
counterproductive economy, parasitic groups and corruption.
Moreover, it means that the basis, the core of this coalition
will be continue to be made up with the workers' forces and the
weaker sections of the population -which have always been the
backbone of PASOK. That is, workers, the wage earners, the
agricultural community, businessmen operating small and medium sized
enterprises, the unemployed and pensioners. Politics owes them
support, distinction and to be explicit.
The central position in this effort is accorded to the high
priority given to the linkage or the organic relationships and
structures within the triangle formed by institutionalized labor
forces - the unemployed and economic migrants. It is this is, upon
which the unity, cohesion and solidarity of our society will be
judged.
The progressive social coalition is constantly widening in
parallel with the groups generated in the era of new entrepreneurs,
the scientists of specialized labor. These forces can actively
contribute to the productive restructuring and modernization of the
country.
And, of course, the new coalition must address, and incorporate
those social forces which are campaigning for contemporary demands
relating to ecology, culture, education, the network of social
solidarity, equality, social problems of young people, as well as
protection and safety of the citizen and the environment. In other
words, whatever comprises quality of life in the world of the
present and the future.
As a result, the new progressive social coalition rallies around
the forces of labor, production, culture, ecology, science and
social solidarity, in a constantly widening social majority.
8. An "open door" policy without preconditions or attempts to
dominate
It is obvious that the political management of this coalition is
a complex and difficult issue, which cannot be confined within the
walls of a party and identified with it.
Neither can it be implemented within a fragmented left of center
with incompatible orbits
Formulation of a progressive majority policy within a framework
of coherent strategy is required
A progressive majority :
The boundaries of which are clearly established against the
conservative proposal, accepting bipolarity in the political and
programmatic confrontation, and rejecting "bipartisanism" in the
sense of a simple alternation of two parties in power.
which is not affected by the "one party mentality and practice "
syndrome and constantly expands its base with the exercise of
political power.
which ensures the co-existence of various tendencies within
itself without the prerequisite of submission to and identification
with, specific views and policies and without any requirement to
restrict forces to one-party initiatives, unconditional submission
to, and identification with specific views and policies, and the
undemanding "entrapment" of forces in single-party initiatives.
structured on the basis of medium- and long-term targets relating to
real problems of the people and the course of the country, without
any dogmatic or "ideological purity and excellence"
syndromes.
The prime vehicle, the main pole of this effort is
unquestionably, PASOK; which is obliged to remain a great, united
majority.
It will be our intitative to pave the way for real convergence of
all the forces active in the central left domain, through central,
regional and local initiatives of a statutory nature, to
face great modern problems. To formulate programmatic and
political agreements for the renewal and evolution of our political
system, with improvement of the quality of political and social
dialogue amongst the parties, civic action, fronts and domains. The
only road open for us is :
An "open door" policy with no attempts to dominate and no
preconditions. Which not only do we declare, but we have the
boldness, the will and the initiative to move along
9. What should change in PASOK in this new epoch
PASOK is a contemporary European socialist party, bound up with
the tradition of the great democratic forces and the struggles of
the Hellenic people for national independence, popular rule and
social justice. At the same time, it is a popular, majority party
with power which for many years has led the country forward, as an
effective, progressive, transparent and effective (instrument of)
government.
As an organization, PASOK is an open, democratic and
representative movement.
In order to meet the demands of the complex duties described here
today, we must
proceed with a "sovereign" transformation the main target of
which will be to reunite the virulent, modern and creative forces in
Hellenic society.
PASOK as a party which has been in power for many years, must
change into a Party, in an open political community. Presenting
itself to the new progressive social coalition as a credible
political domain of open public deliberation, which leads to the
structures and functions of a new order and social negotiation.
The undertaking, which in any case demands many years and will be
the target of many unsuccessful attempts, has two serious
difficulties. The first is that it is occurs in the wider context of
policy judgment and criticism, and the second is that the party's
"denationalization" and its reorientation in society will be obliged
to pass over the structures, functions, mentality and practices we
built up during a whole era.
If, during the change of government, the establishment of PASOK
was associated with intense political and social radicalism, the
dynamics of popular participation and self-organization, in the new
age of modern social reality, reformation and evolution must be
associated with shaping policy, expansion and strengthening of
society and with the active citizen. It is becoming clear that there
are no organizational formulae or models for this change.
The Movement in the cycle of the changes of government must
mainly evolve into a Contemporary Party Institution with coordinated
functions and processes. With limits set in the areas of decision
making which define its relationships and expressions.
With a modern organization of collective action.
We need a Party - A real social entity subject to constant change
and reform.
We need a Party - An integrated Governmental formation which
collectively processes, formulates and implements policies and
proposals.
We need a Party - A developed communicative institution which
comes into direct and immediate contact with the social activity and
communicates with citizens of all categories and groups.
We need a Party - Which bursts out of its entrenchment behind the
walls of the state and is fulfilled on a European and local level by
real processes of decentralization and distribution of powers.
It is clear that such evolution presupposes a new cohesion and
composition which exceeds the fixed power relationships of
authority.
Problems, such as the relationship between Government and the
Party, the granting of independence of action (autonomy) to
executives who function in institutions, the Central Committee's
procedures and of parliamentary representatives in relation to other
local authorities - can only be dealt with, constructively and
permanently in this way
If this evolution is not the result of conscious political choice
of central originat, every change in the party is marginal and
incorporable into our perennial quest and judgment.
At the same time, PASOK must become a real Movement - active
citizens, open to society which organizes its base and its political
action as a popular majority force.
The new progressive political and social majority is not
entrapped in closed organizations, it does not level out diverse
currents and trends, it does not void multitudes of interventions
and routes.
From the beginning PASOK was organized as a Movement, and today,
more than ever, it must stand and evolve as a Movement. And so that
there will be no misinterpretation, this does not concern the
reproduction and broadening of liberalism nor the indeterminate at
the base or the unformed functions without form, but rather the
contrary. Redefinition of the status of the member who in practice
is accorded the right to participate in decision making and
participate in specialised actions and policy formulation. And, of
course, transparency in their lives and actions. PASOK is a force of
morality and political responsibility and it must prove this in
practice. That is why it will establish party "means test"
procedures for all members who hold party and state positions.
The reinforcement of direct democracy, the decentralization of
power, within the party, the discrete role of the party in the
overall operation of the political formation and the strengthening
and improvement of collective organs at each level, are the basis of
change called for in these times. It is for this reason precisely
that the changes must encompass the nature of a true transformation
of the existing PASOK , the dynamics of its reestablishment and have
a specific orientation: The return to the Movement's bases the new
type of peripheral Party organisation, the new collective political
management of PASOK.
Within this trilogy,
Improvement - Revival - Expansion
must henceforth be our guide for our political planning and
action.
The political enhancement of PASOK as a collective political
entity which is centrally marked in a credible and practical way.
Renewal of ideas, people and practices for the reception of which
the necessary sectors and preconditions exist and are being formed.
Expansion into social and political forces with bold initiatives,
openings and open procedures.
In order to attain its important role, PASOK today is called upon
to intensify its efforts
to set ideological and political boundaries against the
conservative front. To consolidate its participation in the
formulation of positions and politics with constant feedback from
the Government and Parliamentary Group, in accordance with permanent
,consolidated procedures. To undertake the responsibility of
organizing and directing social dialogue which leads to development
agreements in every facet of real development at every level. To
heal the wounds and injuries caused recently in relation to the mass
and trade unionist monument. To process the steps and undertake
every initiatives leading to the formation of our political and
social alliances. To upgrade our international relations by
exchanging experiences, processing proposals and taking
international initiatives in the framework of the European Left and
international socialism.